Where have I heard this story before?
Much of this story may seem familiar, although you may have heard of it being attributed to the Mary Rose. If you spend time on social media, and you see one of the many posts showing pictures of the Vasa, you’re guaranteed to see someone comment “Similar story to the Mary Rose” or “The Mary Rose sank in a similar fashion”
Other than both being ships that sunk, and were later raised and put in museums, the similarities are superficial, although there are some worth mentioning;
- They both had their gunports open; The Mary Rose was in combat,Vasa was preparing to fire a salute
- Both were caught by a sudden side wind, causing the ships to heel and take on water.
The differences are a bit more notable though.
- There’s no evidence that Henry VIII had any direct input into the design of the Mary Rose, outside of the original size.
- Henry VIII watched as the Mary Rose sank; Gustav II was fighting in Poland when Vasa sank.
- When the Vasa sank, 30 of her 450 crew died. When the Mary Rose sank, only 30-40 of her 500 crew survived.
- Vasa sank in cold, baltic waters in which shipworm don’t survive. The Mary Rose sank in temperate waters, filled with shipworm and other wood-eating organisms.
- And, most immportantly, the Mary Rose sailed for 34 years.
How was this mistake made? At the time of the Mary Rose being raised, the Vasa’s salvage in 1961 was the only comparable operation, so it was featured in press releases. It just takes one person to misread it and attribute the maiden voyage story to the wrong ship in a high profile-enough broadcast to cement a story.